Erratum to Fragmented QRS on surface electrocardiogram is not a reliable predictor of myocardial scar, angiographic coronary disease or long term adverse outcomes
Erratum

Erratum to Fragmented QRS on surface electrocardiogram is not a reliable predictor of myocardial scar, angiographic coronary disease or long term adverse outcomes


doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-3652.2014.09.03


Erratum to: Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2014;4:279-86

“Fragmented QRS on surface electrocardiogram is not a reliable predictor of myocardial scar, angiographic coronary disease or long term adverse outcomes” Cardiovasc Diagn Ther (1) 2014;4:279-286 edited by Dee Dee Wang1, Amit Tibrewala2, Phuc Nguygen1, Tanmay Swadia1, Gordon Jacobsen1, Arfaat Khan1, Karthik Ananthasubramaniam1

Correspondence to: Karthik Ananthasubramaniam, MD, FACC, FASE, FASNC, FRCP (Glas). Henry Ford Hospital, Heart and Vascular Institute, 2799 West Grand Blvd, K-14, Detroit, MI 48202, USA. Email: kananth1@hfhs.org.

The paper was published with an error in the name of one of the researcher, co-author of this paper: Phuc Nguyen, and not Phuc Nguygen.

The correct name is as below:

Fragmented QRS on surface electrocardiogram is not a reliable predictor of myocardial scar, angiographic coronary disease or long term adverse outcomes

Dee Dee Wang1, Amit Tibrewala2, Phuc Nguyen1, Tanmay Swadia1, Gordon Jacobsen1, Arfaat Khan1, Karthik Ananthasubramaniam1

1Henry Ford Heart and Vascular Institute; 2Cardiovascular Physicians of North Atlanta


References

  1. Wang DD, Tibrewala A, Nguyen P, et al. Fragmented QRS on surface electrocardiogram is not a reliable predictor of myocardial scar, angiographic coronary disease or long term adverse outcomes. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2014;4:279-86. [PubMed]
Cite this article as: Erratum to Fragmented QRS on surface electrocardiogram is not a reliable predictor of myocardial scar, angiographic coronary disease or long term adverse outcomes. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2014;4(5):411. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-3652.2014.09.03